Why I believe in Europe

Posted by healthyeurope on 28/03/12

Right now we are in the middle of what my political science Professors would have called a shift in the “world order”, a “change in paradigm” perhaps. A subject that is exciting from the sleepy hazy afternoons of a lecture theatre, where ambitious overgrown teenagers planned to change the world, but gets pretty destabilising when you are in the middle of one, as we are now.

Certainly in Europe, it feels a little bumpy. Job certainty: out the window. Food, energy and housing prices creeping up and a general sense of urgency, austerity and increased hardship. But in Syria, or many other places going through the “Arab Spring”, that dramatic, painful, tortured birth that is the process of  moving from autocracy to democracy, is far from “a little bumpy”.

But you see, I have been here before. For many of us Europeans, this seismic shift is not unfamiliar. Not as bloody as Syria, but equally as devasting for some, was the transition from communism to capitalism. It is easy to be complacent about the freedoms and the privilege that we experience and take for granted – we in the Western hemisphere in the 21 century.

Life in 1980s Poland was pretty good too. If you didn’t mind sanctions, food queues, the threat of military police, the fear that your neighbors were spying, the bureaucracy, monetary, and state control, and then things became terrifying with a new world, with new rules and without the familiar, ever-present state support. For many of us Europeans, the Second World War did not finish in 1945. It finished in 2004 when Europe was united once more.

Don’t get me wrong, ten years in Brussels and I can give you a list the length of my arm of things that I would like to work better in the “EU”, but my commitment to the project is unshaking.

60 years of peacetime in a land that had seen millennia of war. For the first time in history, we have had three generations born in peace, who have never experienced famine, who have been free to be educated, to own property, to enterprise, to control their fertility, to choose their partner, to have confidence in their children’s future. 500 million people, crossing languages, cultures, religions, coming together successfully to solve these basic human needs that we have struggled with since time began.

Together, we are stronger, in our diversity are united. War no longer threatens our continent and it is the European Union, its foibles, bureaucracy and stability that binds us in our security and human success. The challenges we face today are no less important, but I refuse to believe that our best days are behind us. This vision in worth fighting for, many millions lost their lives, many more worked hard to bring peace and prosperity to future generations.

Maybe our ails are the sign of age, but with age comes wisdom and perspective. And right now, Europe needs to get back up of her knees, hold her head high and remember that she is standing on the shoulders of men who dreamed of the end of war, famine and discrimination, and she carries is her arms the future. A future that is vulnerable, uncertain and absolutely worth fighting for.

The Master and the Machine

Posted by healthyeurope on 29/11/11

I was privileged to be able to attend the TEDxBrussels event last week in Brussels’ Bozar, where the speakers were thinking about the deep future. Putting aside the lack of Europeans and lack of women amongst the presenters, I was interested in how I found myself responding to them.

There was a brilliant presentation from someone who cares a lot about how cars function and how a self-driving car (which exists) operates using cameras etc, etc. My use of ‘etc etc’ shows just how much attention I paid to this part of his presentation. What interested me is how a self-driving car can change the way our societies are organised and function. You wouldn’t need to drive your children to school – just pop them in, set the programme and let the car go and come back. You wouldn’t need driving licenses; children could become more independent and with a greater range much earlier, for better and worse. Traffic accidents would be almost eliminated – therefore so would the vast demand on emergency services, health services. The leading cause of children’s death would be wiped out. The separation between ‘travel’ and ‘living’ could become wider  - special new roads – or narrower – a caravan-like existence where the car travels and you live inside. Public transport, public health and social behaviour would change forever.

What about the presumption that we will still need cars? Are we being conditioned into thinking about self-driving cars, rather than removing cars altogether? Is the world of tomorrow simply a tweaked version of the world of today, or can we really control our future? Are we merely the evolutionary tool that facilities a bio-techno-electro- future for life on our planet…?
That is what I would have been interested in hearing about. This made me think about how some of our priorities and ‘vision’ for Europe and whether we are putting the problem or the solution at the front of our thinking. How often do we put the technology (albeit IT, medicines, novel foods, consumer goods) before we put the problem that policy is supposed to be trying to address? How should we shape policy to make sure that the people are at the centre – before we end up with cities and landscapes dominated by self-driving infrastructure projects to allow our new cars on which to operate.
(By the way, all the presentations including a brilliant Paddy Ashdown on the future of Europe, the rise of China and other high politics – Churchillian and moving can be found online here: http://www.tedxbrussels.eu/2011/)
One final thing that struck me: the car still looked like a car. We need a Steve Jobs of the motoring world. Maybe we can find a female European one?
M

Monika Kosinska Secretary General of EPHA rss

This is the blog of Monika Kosinska Secretary General of EPHA. All views expressed are personal. more.



Advertisement