Monika Kosinska

The Master and the Machine

I was privileged to be able to attend the TEDxBrussels event last week in Brussels’ Bozar, where the speakers were thinking about the deep future. Putting aside the lack of Europeans and lack of women amongst the presenters, I was interested in how I found myself responding to them.

There was a brilliant presentation from someone who cares a lot about how cars function and how a self-driving car (which exists) operates using cameras etc, etc. My use of ‘etc etc’ shows just how much attention I paid to this part of his presentation. What interested me is how a self-driving car can change the way our societies are organised and function. You wouldn’t need to drive your children to school – just pop them in, set the programme and let the car go and come back. You wouldn’t need driving licenses; children could become more independent and with a greater range much earlier, for better and worse. Traffic accidents would be almost eliminated – therefore so would the vast demand on emergency services, health services. The leading cause of children’s death would be wiped out. The separation between ‘travel’ and ‘living’ could become wider – special new roads – or narrower – a caravan-like existence where the car travels and you live inside. Public transport, public health and social behaviour would change forever.

What about the presumption that we will still need cars? Are we being conditioned into thinking about self-driving cars, rather than removing cars altogether? Is the world of tomorrow simply a tweaked version of the world of today, or can we really control our future? Are we merely the evolutionary tool that facilities a bio-techno-electro- future for life on our planet…?
That is what I would have been interested in hearing about. This made me think about how some of our priorities and ‘vision’ for Europe and whether we are putting the problem or the solution at the front of our thinking. How often do we put the technology (albeit IT, medicines, novel foods, consumer goods) before we put the problem that policy is supposed to be trying to address? How should we shape policy to make sure that the people are at the centre – before we end up with cities and landscapes dominated by self-driving infrastructure projects to allow our new cars on which to operate.
(By the way, all the presentations including a brilliant Paddy Ashdown on the future of Europe, the rise of China and other high politics – Churchillian and moving can be found online here: http://www.tedxbrussels.eu/2011/)
One final thing that struck me: the car still looked like a car. We need a Steve Jobs of the motoring world. Maybe we can find a female European one?
M
Author :
Print

Comments

  1. not sure I agree that traffic accidents would be almost eliminated

    Heathrow airport unveiled its new driverless pods last year – transporting passengers in tiny battery powered pods between terminals

    not sure I like the concept of technology taking control of transport eliminating the need for physical presence of drivers

    agree though that exercise is essential for healthy minds and bodies – the success of hired bikes across European cities has shown that there is an appetite among European citizens to get out in the fresh air and if more cities were bicycle friendly and safe for cyclists maybe cars could be left at home more frequently and we’d all be more healthy.

  2. I totally agree with you about the questions we are asking. Yes, how do we put people and living things at the centre – what principles could we make policy by that consider people and life at the centre. Technology is here to support us – not to drive us into ways of being that alienate us from the essence of being alive and human.

    After caring for both my father and my father to honor their wishes to die at home and managing my way through the Aged Care System in Australia to do so, I am writing a memoir that includes a fresh look at the potential of the wisdom in ageing.

Comments are closed.